Water loss
Cooking removes water, not most of the protein or calories.
Cooked chicken tracking
Chicken loses water during cooking, so the cooked weight is lower while the original protein and calories mostly remain in the cooked meat.
Quick answer
Cooked chicken breast weighs less because water is lost during cooking. The macros from the raw chicken mostly remain, so cooked chicken has more calories and protein per gram than raw chicken. Track using either raw weight with a raw entry or cooked weight with a cooked entry, but do not mix them.
Decision criteria
Food tracking works best when the major calorie and macro drivers are separated instead of collapsed into one vague entry.
Cooking removes water, not most of the protein or calories.
Raw entries should be used with raw weights. Cooked entries should be used with cooked weights.
Batch tracking works best when you choose one method and use it for the whole batch.
Chicken breast loses moisture as it cooks. A raw portion can shrink substantially, especially if grilled, baked, or cooked until dry.
That does not mean the protein disappeared. It means the cooked meat is denser per gram.
Do not weigh cooked chicken and log it with a raw chicken entry. That usually undercounts. Do not weigh raw chicken and log it with a cooked entry either.
Use raw weight with raw nutrition, or cooked weight with cooked nutrition. Consistency is the whole trick.
Create a batch recipe from raw chicken weight, then divide by cooked servings. Or save a cooked chicken entry and weigh the cooked portion each time.
Pick the method that matches how you prep and portion food.
Because water leaves during cooking, making the remaining cooked meat more calorie-dense per gram.
Either works if you use the matching nutrition entry and stay consistent.
No. Most protein and calories remain; the weight change is mostly water loss.